Sudan conflict: Army outnumbered on Khartoum's streets

The streets of Khartoum have become a battleground, as rival factions fight for control in the wake of Sudan's ongoing conflict. For two months now, the army has been outnumbered and outmaneuvered by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), leaving much of the city under their control. But how did it come to this? And what does it mean for the future of Sudan? Join us as we explore these questions and more in our latest blog post on the Sudan conflict: Army Outnumbered on Khartoum's Streets Now.

Sudan conflict: Army outnumbered on Khartoum's streets

The conflict in Sudan has its roots in a long history of racism and discrimination against the country's marginalized populations. The ruling elite, made up primarily of Arab Muslims from the north, have traditionally held power at the expense of those in the south and west.

This dynamic boiled over into violence with the ousting of longtime dictator Omar al-Bashir earlier this year. Protests erupted across the country calling for democratic reforms and an end to corruption. In response, Bashir deployed his military to suppress dissent.

But as tensions escalated, factions within the military began to turn on each other. The RSF emerged as a powerful player, with commander Mohamed Hamdan "Hemedti" Dagalo becoming a prominent figure both on the battlefield and in political circles.

Today, much of Khartoum remains under their control, leaving many residents fearful for their safety amid reports of widespread human rights abuses. As negotiations continue between various factions, it remains unclear what lies ahead for Sudan's future stability and democracy.

History of racism

Throughout history, racism has been a pervasive and destructive force that has impacted the lives of countless individuals and communities. The roots of racism can be traced back to colonialism and slavery when European powers used their military might to subjugate other nations, exploit their resources, and enslave their people based on their race.

In America, for example, racism was institutionalized through laws such as Jim Crow laws that enforced segregation between whites and blacks in public spaces. The effects of these discriminatory policies are still felt today with disproportionately high rates of poverty, unemployment, incarceration among black Americans.

Racism also manifests itself in more subtle ways such as microaggressions or implicit bias where individuals unconsciously hold negative attitudes towards members of certain racial groups. This is particularly true for minorities who often face discrimination based on preconceived notions about their abilities or character traits.

Despite some progress made over the years towards greater equality and social justice for all races around the world - including Sudan - there is much work left to be done. It's crucial that we recognize our biases so we can work together to create a future free from prejudice and bigotry.

The Sudanese army's infantry battalions have hardly been present on the streets of Khartoum during the two months-long conflict that has raged in the country, leaving much of the capital under the control of the rival paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

As the Sudanese conflict continues to ravage the country, the absence of army infantry battalions on Khartoum's streets has been noticeable. The Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a rival paramilitary group, has taken control of much of the capital city, leaving many residents feeling uneasy and unsafe.

While it is unclear why the army has not been more present in Khartoum during this time, some speculate that they may be facing their own internal conflicts or struggling with resources. Whatever the reason may be, it is evident that their lack of presence has allowed for other groups to take power and control over important areas.

With tensions high and violence escalating, it remains uncertain what will happen next in Sudan. However, one thing is clear: without strong leadership from all parties involved and a commitment to finding peaceful solutions, innocent civilians will continue to suffer at the hands of those seeking power and control.

RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan "Hemedti" Dagalo became a big gold trader

As the conflict in Sudan continues, with uncertainty on what the future holds for the country, it remains to be seen what role RSF commander Mohamed Hamdan "Hemedti" Dagalo will play. With his rise to power and newfound wealth as a gold trader, some fear he may use his influence for personal gain rather than serving the best interests of Sudan and its people. The situation in Khartoum's streets may seem bleak with an outnumbered army and rival paramilitary forces vying for control, but hope remains that a peaceful resolution can be reached through dialogue and cooperation. Only time will tell how this complex conflict will ultimately unfold.

 Hunter Biden's IRS whistleblower testimony was kept secret by Democrats

Democratic Rep. Jason Smith said they would regret their vote

All House Democrats on the committee that released the whistleblowers' testimony about the Hunter Biden tax probe voted to keep the information out of public view on Thursday. The two IRS whistleblowers said that President Biden's son was given preferential treatment during U.S. Attorney Weiss' investigation, leading to a plea deal that should see him avoid prison time. Hunter Biden admitted guilt in relation to two misdemeanor tax-related charges, despite claims from the whistleblowers of deliberate stalling by the Department of Justice.

The chair of the House Ways & Means Committee, Jason Smith, R-Mo., said Republicans acted "in good faith" while accusing Democrats of 'sidestepping' the two whistleblowers.

Smith said on Friday, "Democrats will regret their vote as more facts come to light and are weighed in the court of public opinion. Justice cannot be skewed in favor of the wealthy and the politically connected."

BIDEN BRIBERY DOCUMENT NEVER MADE IT TO IRS INVESTIGATORS, WHISTLEBLOWER EXPLAINS: 'INFLUENCED BY POLITICS'

In a 25-18 party line vote, his committee, which gathered the testimony, decided to make the nearly 400 pages public. During our committee meeting, Democrats sidestepped the whistleblowers' damning testimony about misconduct and special treatment in Hunter Biden's alleged tax crimes," Smith said. During the whistleblower interviews, Republicans shared information and treated Democrats equally.

On Friday, Rep. Kevin Hern, R-Okla., said that his Democratic counterparts' "no" votes amounted to "covering" for Hunter Biden.

GOP WHISTLEBLOWER TESTIMONY: DOJ, FBI, IRS INTERRUPTED HUNTER BIDEN PROBE

As Hern pointed out, "The evidence presented to committee members was clear. The Biden administration weaponized the federal government to protect the president's son from the consequences of his illegal actions." It's hard to believe anyone would vote to cover up those crimes, but that's exactly what every Democrat member of the committee did."

The top Democrat on the committee, Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., said after the vote that his party opposed the GOP's "process" rather than public disclosures.

WHISTEBLOWER: FBI, IRS OBJECTIONS TO HUNTER BIDEN INVESTIGATORS' QUESTIONS ABOUT 'DAD' AND 'BIG GUY'

Several witnesses were never contacted. There was no clear legislative purpose to the discussion," Neal told reporters after the closed-door meeting to discuss the documents' release.

 Day 485 of the Russia-Ukraine war: Key events

These are the main developments as the war enters its 485th day.

As of Friday, June 23, 2023, this is the situation.

A fight

This is a route used by the Russian military to move between Crimea and other parts of Ukraine

Russian investigators said four missiles had been fired by Ukrainian forces at the bridge, the RIA news agency reported. One of the missiles had French markings, according to a military investigator's spokesman.

Ali Hashem, reporting from Mariupol, said one of three bridges in the area had been damaged. A number of analysts believe the attack was the result of fears that the Russians were mobilizing from that region so that the army could resupply towards Kherson. The Russian side still has a lot to say about how this will be handled.

Officials appointed by the Russian government

The Russian-appointed governor of Kherson, which Russian forces have captured in a "special military operation", said the bridge had been damaged but no one had been injured.

On one picture Saldo posted on Telegram, water was visible beneath the bridge's surface and debris was scattered nearby. Saldo suggested Ukraine used British-supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles.

Saldo suggested Ukraine may have used British-supplied Storm Shadow cruise missiles for the attack in a picture he posted on Telegram with a large hole in the bridge's surface and water below.

The Kherson region and Crimea have a link that continues to operate - a reserve route has been set up temporarily for vehicular traffic."

Crimean governor Sergei Aksyonov urged people to remain calm and said specialists were examining the site to determine when traffic over the bridge could resume.

Remarks from Ukraine

A Ukrainian official on the Kherson region's governing body, Yuriy Sobolevsky, said the attack was a blow to the occupiers' military logistics. Kiev says it wants to retake Crimea and drive all Russian forces out of its territory. In addition to psychological impacts on the occupiers, he added, “There is no safe place on Kherson region's territory where they can feel safe.”

The selection of Donald Trump's big vice president could shock the world

Speculation abounds regarding who Donald Trump might select if he is successful in the GOP nomination next year. Many believe that Ron DeSantis, the Florida governor, might be the smart choice. Nevertheless, a potential White House partnership is a two-way road, and DeSantis has been vocal in expressing his disinterest. The question remains: would he reconsider and view the position of vice president too attractive to pass up? So far, DeSantis appears not to be swayed.

DeSantis rules out being Trump's running mate

In March, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis told Newsmax TV that he did not consider running with Donald Trump. He said, “I'm probably more of an executive guy.” In my opinion, you want to be able to do things. That's why I got into this job in the first place. “We’re able to make things happen, and I think that's what I am most adept at.”

Trump and Ron DeSantis won't work together

Mike Pence fit Trump better because he was soft spoken and a party animal. He wants to be at the top, not Trump's also-ran.

Unlike Trump, Ron DeSantis isn’t one to hold back. He’s made clear his willingness to take on his Left-wing opponents, from schools' 'wokeness' to the Walt Disney Company. Not only that, he's even gone so far as to criticize Trump's chaotic leadership style, branding it "chaotic," and mock the commander-in-chief's coined nickname for him - “Ron DeSanctimonius.” In response, the governor joked about it in an interview with Piers Morgan by saying: “I don’t know how to spell the sanctimonious one. I don’t really know what it means, but I kinda like it, it’s long, it’s got a lot of vowels. We’ll go with that." That said, he still brushed off the jab as "background noise".

"It's not important for me to fight with people on social media. It doesn't accomplish anything for the people I represent." said DeSantis.

Florida's DeSantis Has a Strong Record

A successful governor, he claims to have carried every county in Florida except three last November, expanding his margin of victory. He has toured the country extensively.

In his last year in office, Trump let Anthony Fauci almost run the country's affairs, according to many conservatives, and he did not fire him. DeSantis said he would have fired somebody like Fauci if he had been in charge of COVID. “I think he got too big for his britches, and I think he did a lot of damage,” he said. In the event Democrats win in 2024, Ron DeSantis is concerned about the state of the nation.

You have to look at 2024 and say, regardless of personalities or individuals, if the Biden regime continues, and they're able to pick up 10-15 seats in the House and a couple of Senate seats, this country will be in dire straits,” DeSantis said.

"You can't win just with Republicans," DeSantis said. "You need to win with independents, and you need to convince a few Democrats, which I did in Florida, because they aren't woke, they don't like some of the stuff going on. So I think you could appeal to people across the spectrum." They want their streets safe, and they want quality education.

Among the publications where John Rossomando has written are The American Thinker, Daily Wire, Red Alert Politics, CNSNews.com, The Daily Caller, Human Events, Newsmax, The American Spectator, TownHall.com, and Crisis Magazine. In 2008, he won the first place Pennsylvania Associated Press Managing Editors award for his reporting for The Bulletin, a daily newspaper in Philadelphia with 100,000 readers.

 Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg say they are ready for a cage fight

Business rivalry apparently isn't enough for two of the tech industry's best billionaires. Now Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg say they want to make their decision in a cage fight.

The Twitter owner and CEO of Tesla ( TSLA ) and Musk recently said they are "getting ready for a cage fight" with the CEO of Meta and Zuckerberg. In an Instagram post on Wednesday, Zuckerberg posted a screenshot of Musk's tweet in response to a post with the caption: "Sent me the location".

Musk then responded to a tweet from tech news website Verge editor Alex Heath about the fight with "Vegas Octagon" — a reference to the Las Vegas arena that hosts the Ultimate Fighting Championship.

I have this great initiative.

CNN has reached out to Meta for comment. A company spokesperson told The Verge: "[Instagram] speaks for itself."

It's clear that Zuckerberg and Musk aren't on target.However, who will win the cage fight remains to be seen. Musk is physically bigger than Zuckerberg, but Metta Chief practices jiu-jitsu, a Brazilian martial art, and won gold and silver medals at a tournament in May.

Oddspedia, a sports betting platform, compiled odds from several different bookmakers, including Bovada, Bet Online and Ladbrokes, and concluded that Zuckerberg has an 83 percent chance of winning the fight.

Meanwhile, bookmaker Paddy Power is betting the match never takes place, but if it does, both men have an equal chance of winning.

"If this fight actually goes ahead, with a bit of luck, they'll both see each other out," a spokesman for the Irish company said in a statement.

They have history

Ranked first in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index - you've got to be bumped before that. In 2017, a very public reaction to the future of this artificial intelligence

Musk has repeatedly warned about AI's complacency, calling it an existential threat to the human race. Zuckerberg, on the other hand, is more optimistic about the theory.

During a Facebook Live broadcast at the time, he dismissed the "doomsday scenarios" as "quite irresponsible".

Musk responded shortly after, tweeting: "I've talked to Mark about this.

Musk overtook Zuckerberg for the top spot on the Bloomberg Billionaires Index in 2020, becoming the world's richest person instantly.

French luxury goods giant LVMH (LVMHF) chairman Bernard Arnault briefly ousted him from the top spot in December, before May regained the title. Zuckerberg now ten green no

 Texas votes against repeat sufferer Angela Shatton in her husband's impeachment trial

The wife of Texas Gen. Ken Paxton is no longer allowed to vote in her husband's impeachment trial as a result of new laws approved Wednesday by state authorities.

The Dallas-area Rep. has previously made a point of not backing down from state candidates and "playing a role" in her husband's impeachment trial.

But after negotiating a bond and bond, the state is following new rules ahead of Ken Paxton's Sept. 5 impeachment trial, which now includes barring his spouse from voting in impeachment proceedings. Is. thing

The resolution states that "a member of the court who is a spouse in a derivative court is considered a conflict under the Texas Constitution." While the rules allow the PML-N to be present in impeachment proceedings, the new rule states, "Such a member of the Court shall not vote on a motion or question, or deliberate on adjournment or To participate in. Not eligible

approved the rules by a 25-3 vote. There was no public hearing before the vote and the names of candidates who voted against any of the resolutions were not immediately available.

BBN contacted Sen. Paxton Wednesday night. Tony Buzby, an attorney who spoke to Ken Pekin, called the impeachment trial a "moot" in a statement Friday after Texas announced its impeachment trial rules.

"We tried to disprove every count of this baseless impeachment," said Ab Buzri.

Absent a unanimous vote, Rep. Lt. Govt. Dr. Patrick, serving as president of the performance when the vote was taken, said he did nothing to "unify" the Republican-controlled chamber with other situations. "You are united in taking an oath so that justice will prevail, that one will do whatever is done in the most just way," Patrick said.

In a separate resolution, Texas officials asked Paxton to appear in person to answer. >

Ken Paxton was impeached by the Texas House of Representatives in May last month on charges of misconduct, including allegedly using his office to compromise a prominent donor. He denied wrongdoing. Under the Texas Constitution, Paxton is quietly suspended while the case is pending but will be reinstated if he is acquitted.

BBC previously reported that they are also reviewing an FBI investigation into abuse of office. Also appointed for indictment. Denied all errors and omissions package.

Clarification: Updated to be more precise about the new rule that affects the spouse of the subject of an impeachment trial. Also updated with more answers.

 

Adam Schiff Gets John Durham to Admit Russia Helped Trump

When Republican Special Counsel John Durham gave House Judiciary comments on Wednesday, he thought it was an opportunity to score points on Democrats, particularly Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), for any criticism. of the. Spending years in relationships. .

What they got in return was a brief moment when Schiff found Hum — the man tasked with concluding that the FBI's investigation into Russia's links to the 2016 disease campaign was justified. . — Durham at work.A former manager of the impeachment inquiry against Chef Druze questioned the president's release of information about the 2016 election that exposed Russian hacking. Durham repeatedly insisted that he had no knowledge of this. But in the midst of the exchange, Drumm made it clear that he did not doubt the veracity of any implication that Russia was trying to help — something most Republicans have vehemently denied.

Reuters/Elizabeth Frantz

When Republicans brought Special Counsel John Durham to the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, they thought it would be an opportunity to score points against Democrats, particularly Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), who has criticized Donald Trump's impeachment inquiry. Criticized Russia. Spent years building connections with

What they got instead was a viral moment when Schiff found Durham — the man tasked with concluding whether the FBI's investigation into Russia's ties to the Trump campaign in 2016 was appropriate. were - Took Durham to work.

Schiff, the former impeachment manager against Trump, questioned Durham about whether President Trump disclosed information released by Russian hackers during the 2016 election. Durham repeatedly insisted he had no knowledge of the matter. But during the exchange, Durham made it clear that he did not doubt the authenticity of the evidence showing Russia was trying to help Trump — something many Republicans have vehemently denied.

"I don't think there's any question that the Russians hacked the system, they released the information," Durham said.

"And it was helpful for the Trump campaign, right?" asked the chef.

After trying to deflect the question, Durham agreed that the Russians had been helpful to the Trump campaign.

"And Trump used it, like I said, didn't he use stolen documents a hundred times during the campaign," Schiff said.

Durham said he "didn't really read the papers, or listen to the news."

"So I don't know that," he said.

"Were you completely oblivious to Donald Trump's use of stolen emails a hundred times during the campaign?" asked the chef. "Did that escape your attention?"

Durham replied that he was not aware of this.

The exchange was one of several tense moments between Schiff and Durham throughout the day as Republicans backed Durham's report, insisting the FBI was investigating possible collusion between Trump and Russia in the 2016 election. Is. Should not have investigated.

More specifically, Durham appears to be unaware of the important facts of the alliance between the campaign and Russia. That ignorance came to the fore in several awkward exchanges with Democrats on the House Judiciary Commission.

This has been questioned by Eric Sowell-Durham about how Weill has said he "tried a real deal in Moscow and hid it from the public." It was a deal, detailed in Mueller's report, in which the Russian government promised to license one of the towers to Moscow. The proposed payment, the public gathering about it at the time and at the time, caused a lot of damage to Russia on its campaign. Drum replied, "I don't know anything about that."